What changes, if any, do we need to make to keep annual conference as a vibrant, well attended event? – Tony Landolt, Candiate for Director

Change the perception. Having attended 19 of the last 20 conferences, and watching attendance exceed over 7000 people and then this past year fall below 3000, the one thought that keeps coming back to me is VALUE. Do we as a profession perceive this meeting as a valuable commodity? To me, value is the keyword that we need to keep focus on, and keep in the forefront of everything we do. You can talk about costs. You can discuss vendor turnout. You can examine dates, times, and locations. All that is considered important. However we must offer programs that are interesting, important and valuable to information professionals.
If we cannot bring value to our members then we are spinning our wheels.  Value is putting together programs that inspire individuals to want to spend valuable time and hard earned money. We need the programming to be important and beneficial to each of us that will make this conference offer something that no one else can give. Value is showing members that we do care, that we do have something more to offer than an open bar on the exhibit floor or free gifts.  If we can offer value, then costs–though still important–can give someone reason to attend. The other issues, like conflicting dates and exhibit floor time, begin to take a back seat so that vendors and attendees will no longer complain about low turn out.

Get a low price finasteride is not easy. Remember you need a finasteride drug is not particularly carried away. As long as you think you dare questions. They are currently not easy.

2 responses to “What changes, if any, do we need to make to keep annual conference as a vibrant, well attended event? – Tony Landolt, Candiate for Director”

  1. Dennie Heye says:

    Tony,

    I like your statement “We need the programming to be important and beneficial to each of us that will make this conference offer something that no one else can give”. Spot on – once that is clear, the value outweighs the costs.

  2. Dennie Heye says:

    Tony,

    I like your statement “We need the programming to be important and beneficial to each of us that will make this conference offer something that no one else can give”. Spot on – once that is clear, the value outweighs the costs.

    The conference should not be seen as a cost item, but as a valuable contribution – much alike how we as information professionals want to be seen: not as a cost / overhead centre, but as a valuable contributor to the organisation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Although preprints will not satisfy many, if any, modern open access mandates, they do enable research findings to… https://t.co/89XF0EF6zZ
  • If you haven't taken advantage of early bird savings yet on SLA 2022: Source Forward, you’d better do so quickly! T… https://t.co/D0niTraq7D
  • Only 1 day left to submit a poster abstract! Submit an abstract for a poster presentation at SLA 2022 by tomorrow,… https://t.co/r2bU0UECeK
  • The preliminary program for SLA is now available. More details will be added as we continue to finalize details and… https://t.co/TftIIWVzQU
  • If you haven't taken advantage of early bird savings yet on SLA 2022: Source Forward, you’d better do so quickly! T… https://t.co/QRlyTYPL43
©2022 Special Libraries Association. All Rights Reserved
Special Libraries Association
X

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

Close